data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/71d19/71d198b5bd62789d2a0ba26043ab95b1089cafd4" alt="U20-World-Rugby-logo"
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eaf47/eaf470829610b0dde08a05a730f25a16f655f374" alt=""
England take their line out but lose the ball on the ground as Thomson kicks down field and England return the kick as Thomson kicks again.
I thought every call by the ref was wrong unless it does to SA... That is all I am reading
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eaf47/eaf470829610b0dde08a05a730f25a16f655f374" alt=""
From the restart England knocks on as the Boks play but they play on the ground and it is a English penalty.
I never said it was. You are clearly a moron
If you block a player, and he did (contact between the two), then it's obstruction. And what about the shoulder charge? Was that also fine taking into account the two yellows for dangerous tackles?
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eaf47/eaf470829610b0dde08a05a730f25a16f655f374" alt=""
England lead by 15 points 15 minutes into the second half.
South Africa scrum now goes backward and collapses, guess that is a bad call as well?
Hahaha. He didn't actually prevent the tackle being made. It was just very poor defence from the SA 10 and you were saved by your winger
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/eaf47/eaf470829610b0dde08a05a730f25a16f655f374" alt=""
England scrum moving forward and Zas intercept but it is advantage to England.
So? Doesn't mean it wasn't a poor call